FFOCUS creates a path for open dialogue that identifies solutions to the problems faced by today’s travelers, and advocates on behalf of the traveling public to improve the travel experience for all.
Adopted March 2009 by the FFOCUS Policy Committee
As a leading advocate for frequent flyers and the traveling public in general, FFOCUS is deeply concerned about recent events allegedly taking place within US Airways under the guise of "Fraud Control." We have had reports from some of our members that US Airways sold them blocks of miles under a legitimate promotion, and then confiscated their miles and terminated their accounts when they tried to redeem the miles purchased. These members supposedly followed ALL PUBLISHED RULES of the Miles Purchase Program, and US Airways has not provided them with any recourse or valid explanation for their punitive actions.
While we acknowledge that any airline has the absolute right and even duty to ensure their program rules are properly followed, it now appears that customers who have acted legitimately within the terms and conditions of the Dividend Miles program have been punished for the misdeeds of others.
The FFOCUS Policy Board believes that US Airways is behaving in an arbitrary & capricious manner and in some cases without just cause. The trigger for account audits and arbitrary closures seems to follow a pattern: Customers responded to promotions aggressively, resulting in significant revenue for US Airways. Small accounts instantly grew to several hundred thousand miles, and subsequently end up "Under Review," Suspended or Closed, with no refund for the amount of the purchased miles.
In many cases, US Airways has refused to explain to the customer the reasons for their actions, and has refused to engage in meaningful dialogue with those affected. Furthermore US Airways has not permitted any discussion or appeal on the part of the affected customer, effectively stonewalling.
The actions undertaken by US Airways create the perception of impropriety. We urgently call upon senior management to publicly explain why customers who followed the rules have had their miles confiscated, and to assure Dividend Miles members that they can continue to redeem Dividend Miles for award travel without the fear that their accounts will be terminated or frozen without cause.
The FFOCUS Policy Committee
As a founding member and Chairman Emeritus of Frequent Flyers Organized & Concerned about Unacceptable Service or FFOCUS, allow me to be the first to welcome you to our web site. On behalf of the entire membership, we hope you'll visit often and join us in our efforts to become a voice for all airline customers. As you navigate the site you will find helpful hints on how to reach out to airlines effectively when confronted with poor service. We also have a Customer Advocate assigned to most carriers in the United States. If you decide to join us we have a very lively and fun bulletin board forum full of useful information to those who travel. We encourage you to register for our forums, and participate in the various airline- and travel-related discussions. Thanks for dropping by, we hope to see you often either as a visitor or member.
Warmest regards,
Robert Johnson, Chairman Emeritus, FFOCUS.org
MSNBC - The Transportation Security Administration is working with some domestic airlines to test paperless boarding passes, which allow air travelers to download the document onto a cell phone or other mobile device. Read More>
DOT Press Release - The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today unveiled an updated version of Fly Rights: A Consumer Guide to Air Travel, its popular guide to air travelers’ rights. Read More>
{the RNP routes are one of the building blocks of the NextGen ATC system}
Chicago Tribune - The equivalent of "Lexus lanes" are being created in the skies above Chicago that should help reduce traffic jams that often block arrivals to a vital runway at Midway Airport. Read More>
Seattle Times - Round-trip surcharges of $20 to $60 are set for as many as 33 days still this year, or almost one out of every four, according to Tom Parsons, chief executive officer of Bestfares.com, and Graeme Wallace of FareCompare.com. Read More>
US Airways launched a new program on March 17, 2010, entitled “Preferred Seats.” In a March 16, 2010, e-mail to its Dividend Mile Preferred customers, US Airways stated “To give you access in advance to the best seats in Coach, we're reserving select seats in front, plus the exit rows, exclusively for Preferred members. When you book, you won't have to compete with other passengers for a limited number of Choice Seats.”
What US Airways failed to clearly communicate to their Preferred members in the body of the announcement is that “Choice Seats,” which were previously available to Preferred members at any time in advance, for no charge, are no longer available in advance, and they are no longer complimentary for Preferred members. This information was buried in the “Frequently Asked Questions” section, which required clicking into an additional link.
If you are a Dividend Miles Preferred member, FFOCUS would like to know how this affects you. We think some of you might not be affected, but for most Preferreds, this will be a negative change. US Airways is still allowing Preferred members to reserve exit row seats in advance, at no charge. But not every Preferred member is willing and/or able to sit in the exit row, so US Airways sets aside seats in the front portion of the aircraft for their best customers, who often book their flights very close to their travel date, when most leisure travelers have already bought their tickets and reserved the desirable seats.
The ability to reserve decent coach seats at the last minute is one of the few “perks” left for elite travelers since the reduction of capacity has led to a lower rate of upgrade success, with elites competing for fewer first class seats. US Airways is still allocating some seats towards the front of the cabin as “Preferred Seats,” which are reserved for Preferred members to book for free, any time in advance. But the number of “Preferred Seats” is reduced by about 50%, so US Airways can ensure a certain number of “Choice Seats,” which will only be available for purchase to all customers, regardless of their elite status.
No other airline has implemented a policy in which their own elites must pay for any seat in the economy cabin. FFOCUS is opposed to this policy, and has contacted Management at US Airways to request that they reverse it. We have made it clear that the Preferred members who will be most adversely affected by this policy are the ones who pay the highest fares. If you read through the posts on Flyertalk in the attached thread http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/us-airways-dividend-miles/1063768-preferred-vs-choice-seats-preferred-members-no-longer-have-access-choice-seats.html, you will see examples of how Dividend Miles Preferred members are getting burned when they book last minute travel on US Airways. And now US Airways has re-designed their online seat maps so that all “Choice Seats” appear “occupied” until check-in time, when they become available for purchase.
As of this time, US Airways has not responded to FFOCUS. We therefore need your assistance in making your voice heard. If you are a Dividend Miles Preferred member, please e-mail customer.relations@usairways.com and express your displeasure. Even if you believe that this policy does not affect you because you “always” book your travel well in advance, we all have had unforeseen situations come up in which we have had to travel on very short notice, and pay several times the lowest coach fare. A number of our members have indicated that this is the change which will drive them away once and for all.
If you have already been burned by this policy, or it has so angered you that you are now buying tickets on other carriers, please send US Airways copies of every ticket purchase which they lost because of their shortsightedness. It is important that US Airways sees hard evidence of how much lost revenue this decision is costing them, and how many dollars they are losing by reaching for pennies.
Please help FFOCUS continue our mission to advocate for airline customers all over, and in this particular case US Preferred customers. The discussion for this issue on FFOCUS’ board is: http://www.ffocus.org/members/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5192
Thank you for your cooperation.
Recent experience leaves me wondering about the applicability of the $150 change fee charged by most airlines under certain circumstances. There are times when for one reason or another you just want to buy up in class or fare category but are NOT changing flights at all--in such cases I do NOT think the change fee should apply--but it does. Seems to me that airlines are leaving money on the table. Here are two scenarios, both of which have applied to me on one occasion or another:
1. Your company requires you to purchase the lowest fare available, but by doing so you are disqualified from one or more perks (such as companion upgrades). You buy the original ticket to get the receipt then decide to move up to the next fare class so you would be eligible for the perk...as long as the fare class is available, you should only be charged the difference in my opinion as you are NOT changing flights. The airlines don't see it that way...they want the $150 change fee on TOP of the fare difference. So rather than pick up an extra $50 or $75, they want $200 or $225, and get NOTHING...money left on the table.
2. Again you have to buy the lowest available fare in a market but the instant upgrade fare is reasonable. You buy the original ticket to get the receipt and are willing to shell out the extra out of pocket to guarantee a seat in first. Again, they want the change fee on TOP of the fare difference.
I have spoken to some folks at the airlines about this, and they are working on a solution but to me it can't come soon enough. I think there are many of us who, if given the opportunity, would shell a little out of pocket to have a better experience.
Seems to me they are just leaving money on the table...... what do YOU think????
FFOCUS is cautiously optimistic about the DOT's newly announced rule requiring US airlines to allow passengers to disembark after 3 hours on the tarmac. While we had hoped that the airlines would have adopted some proactive measures on their own, we hope this action motivates airlines to make those changes so that incidents like this are few and far between. We remain concerned, however, that by focusing on adherence to this new rule new problems will arise which will further inconvenience airline customers and add unecessary cost and complexity to airline operations.